Global Cuisine Council
Defining the world's culinary regions
Before the system writes any recipe, it has to take a position on what 'regional cuisine' actually means. The shallow move is a Wikipedia-shaped summary cribbed from training data. Culinary Explorer refuses that move and convenes a council instead.
The council is a panel of methodological specialists, each running on Claude Opus, each carrying a different academic lens (trade routes, ecology, language and culture, modern markets), and each prompted with explicit friction points against the others. They are engineered to disagree on specific grounds. That disagreement is the engine.
Three rounds later, the output is a calibrated map of the world's culinary regions, every dissent recorded by name and every chair tie-break written down with rationale.
- Three rounds, Delphi-style: parallel research, cross-examination, calibration.
- Specialist personas include an academic affiliation, a doctoral thesis, a published works list, and an explicit list of which other specialists they will clash with.
- Consensus rules: 3-of-4 passes; 2-2 splits go to the chair with written justification; 0-consensus deadlocks invoke an `overlays:` schema escape hatch instead of forcing a false answer.
- Output: a 17-region taxonomy in YAML, with per-region council briefs that seed downstream regional councils.
"The three lenses are genuinely complementary, not redundant. A terroir-only council would have produced ~10 climate-coherent zones and missed the Ottoman, Persianate, and Caribbean Creole genealogies entirely."Global Cuisine Council retrospective
-
round-1-research.md -
round-2-cross-examination.md -
round-3-calibration.md -
docs/taxonomy/global-cuisine-regions.yaml